Engagement models
Choose the engagement structure that fits the work.
The four engagement models
01 · Fixed scope · weeks, not months
Direction Sprint
Best forOrganizations requiring clarity before committing to a larger build
A short, fixed-scope engagement that produces a clear plan, architecture outline and estimate you can act on — with or without Omnexa.
Includes
- Stakeholder workshops
- Process mapping
- Requirements
- Experience direction
- Architecture outline
- Delivery roadmap
- Commercial estimate
02 · Milestone-based · agreed scope
Defined System Build
Best forClearly scoped platforms and applications
Delivery of an agreed system against defined milestones, with regular demonstrations and acceptance at each stage.
Includes
- Defined deliverables
- Agreed milestones
- Regular demonstrations
- Quality assurance
- Deployment
- Launch support
03 · Capacity-based · monthly planning
Embedded Product Team
Best forLonger product roadmaps and changing priorities
A dedicated team that works through your roadmap, with priorities set together each month.
Includes
- Dedicated engineering capacity
- Product and technical leadership
- Flexible backlog
- Continuous delivery
- Monthly planning
04 · Ongoing · reviewed monthly
Continuous Technology Partnership
Best forSystems requiring active maintenance and development
Ongoing responsibility for keeping systems healthy and moving forward, with an agreed mix of maintenance and improvement.
Includes
- Monitoring
- Maintenance
- Security updates
- Performance improvements
- New functionality
- Technical advisory
How to choose
Start from where you are today.
You are not yet sure what to build, or what it should cost.
Direction SprintThe scope is clear and you want a defined system delivered.
Defined System BuildYou have a product roadmap that will keep changing.
Embedded Product TeamYou have systems in production that need care and continued development.
Continuous Technology Partnership
Side by side
How the models differ.
| Direction Sprint | Defined System Build | Embedded Product Team | Continuous Technology Partnership | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | Fixed, discovery-focused | Agreed up front | Flexible backlog | Agreed service + backlog |
| Planning rhythm | Single short engagement | Milestones | Monthly | Monthly review |
| Main output | Plan, architecture, estimate | A working system | Continuous product delivery | Healthy, evolving systems |
| Commercial basis | Fixed fee | Milestone-based | Capacity-based | Retained service |
Questions
Common questions about working together.
No. Every engagement is scoped against your requirements, so we provide a written estimate after an initial conversation rather than a generic rate card.
Yes. Direction Sprint outputs are written to be usable by any capable team. Most clients continue with Omnexa, but there is no obligation.
Often that is the natural path: a Direction Sprint leads to a Defined System Build, which then moves into a Continuous Technology Partnership after launch.
Every engagement has a named senior technical lead who stays involved from planning through delivery, supported by the specialists the work requires.
START A CONVERSATION
Request a scope.
Tell us about the work and the model you think fits. We will confirm the right structure and prepare a written estimate.
